[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-80210":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"fullName":6,"owner":7,"repo":5,"description":8,"homepage":9,"htmlUrl":10,"language":11,"languages":10,"totalLinesOfCode":10,"stars":12,"forks":13,"watchers":14,"openIssues":15,"contributorsCount":15,"subscribersCount":15,"size":15,"stars1d":16,"stars7d":17,"stars30d":18,"stars90d":15,"forks30d":15,"starsTrendScore":19,"compositeScore":20,"rankGlobal":10,"rankLanguage":10,"license":21,"archived":22,"fork":22,"defaultBranch":23,"hasWiki":24,"hasPages":22,"topics":25,"createdAt":10,"pushedAt":10,"updatedAt":36,"readmeContent":37,"aiSummary":38,"trendingCount":15,"starSnapshotCount":15,"syncStatus":16,"lastSyncTime":39,"discoverSource":40},80210,"skills-for-humanity","human-avatar\u002Fskills-for-humanity","human-avatar","Structured reasoning methodologies from history's most rigorous thinkers, packaged as Claude Code skills.","",null,"JavaScript",165,20,3,0,2,18,86,11,3.97,"MIT License",false,"main",true,[26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"claude-code","claude-code-plugin","cognitive-frameworks","creativity","decision-making","ethics","mental-models","problem-solving","reasoning","systems-thinking","2026-06-12 02:03:59","\u003Cdiv align=\"center\">\n\u003Cbr>\n\n# skills-for-humanity\n\n\u003Cbr>\n\n**Structured reasoning methodologies from history's most rigorous thinkers, packaged as Claude Code skills.**\n\n\u003Cbr>\n\n[![npm](https:\u002F\u002Fimg.shields.io\u002Fnpm\u002Fv\u002F@human-avatar\u002Fskills-for-humanity?style=flat-square&color=black&label=npm)](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.npmjs.com\u002Fpackage\u002F@human-avatar\u002Fskills-for-humanity)  ![](https:\u002F\u002Fimg.shields.io\u002Fbadge\u002F171_skills-black?style=flat-square)  ![](https:\u002F\u002Fimg.shields.io\u002Fbadge\u002F27_categories-black?style=flat-square)  ![](https:\u002F\u002Fimg.shields.io\u002Fbadge\u002FClaude_Code-compatible-black?style=flat-square)\n\n\u003Cbr>\n\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\n| | Skills |\n|---|---|\n| **Think Sharper** | `\u002Flogic` · `\u002Fprobability` · `\u002Fdecision` · `\u002Fconstraint` · `\u002Fgame-theory` · `\u002Fepistemology` · `\u002Finvestigation` |\n| **Think Differently** | `\u002Fcreativity` · `\u002Fanalogy` · `\u002Fplay` |\n| **Think About People** | `\u002Fcommunication` · `\u002Fsocial` · `\u002Femotional` · `\u002Fethics` · `\u002Fidentity` · `\u002Fnarrative` · `\u002Fpsychology` · `\u002Fmindset` · `\u002Fwriting` |\n| **Think in Time & Systems** | `\u002Fsystems` · `\u002Ftemporal` · `\u002Fhistorical` · `\u002Fresource` · `\u002Fstrategy` |\n| **See More Clearly** | `\u002Faesthetic` · `\u002Fsensory` |\n\n---\n\nEach skill is a complete procedure: a defined problem type, a sequence of moves, a structured output. Not a concept to apply — a method to run.\n\n**Lineage:** [de Bono](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FEdward_de_Bono) · [Meadows](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FDonella_Meadows) · [Altshuller](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FGenrich_Altshuller) · [Minto](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FBarbara_Minto) · [Goldratt](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FEliyahu_M._Goldratt) · [Tetlock](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FPhilip_E._Tetlock) · [Klein](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FGary_Klein) · [Mill](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FJohn_Stuart_Mill) · [Kant](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FImmanuel_Kant) · [Aristotle](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FAristotle) · [Noddings](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FNel_Noddings) · [Rawls](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FJohn_Rawls) · [Sun Tzu](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FSun_Tzu) · [Clausewitz](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FCarl_von_Clausewitz) · [Musashi](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FMiyamoto_Musashi) · [Nash](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FJohn_Forbes_Nash_Jr.) · [Axelrod](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FRobert_Axelrod) · [Vickrey](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FWilliam_Vickrey) · [Shapley](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FLloyd_Shapley) · [Spence](https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FMichael_Spence)\n\n---\n\n## Install\n\n```bash\nnpx @human-avatar\u002Fskills-for-humanity\n```\n\nRun again to update. Restart Claude Code when done.\n\n---\n\n## Use\n\n```\n\u002Fthink\n```\n\nDescribe your situation. Routes to the right methodology automatically. You don't need to know which skill fits — that's the point.\n\nEvery skill pauses before running and asks how deep you want to go.\n\n---\n\n## Skills reference\n\n### Think Sharper\n\n#### `\u002Flogic`\n\n- [`\u002Flogic`](docs\u002Flogic\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the logic toolkit.\n- [`\u002Flogic-argument-validation`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fargument-validation.md) — Check whether an argument's premises actually support its conclusion, and identify logical fallacies.\n- [`\u002Flogic-causality-mapping`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fcausality-mapping.md) — Map causal relationships, trace dependencies, and reason about consequences before acting.\n- [`\u002Flogic-check`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fcheck.md) — A fast, comprehensive logic report on any argument, plan, or reasoning — validates premises, tests inference, detects fallacies, surfaces hidden assumptions, and produces a verdict.\n- [`\u002Flogic-consistency-check`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fconsistency-check.md) — Surface internal contradictions, conflicting requirements, and edge cases that expose hidden conflicts in a document, spec, plan, design, or set of requirements.\n- [`\u002Flogic-constraint-mapping`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fconstraint-mapping.md) — Map the full constraint landscape for a decision, design, or plan — distinguishing hard limits from soft preferences, surfacing hidden constraints, and finding conflicts between them.\n- [`\u002Flogic-council`](docs\u002Flogic\u002Fcouncil.md) — Run a reasoning problem, argument, plan, or decision through a council of 5 logical reasoning advisors who analyze it from distinct reasoning frameworks, peer-review each other, and synthesize a verdict on whether the reasoning holds.\n\n#### `\u002Fprobability`\n\n- [`\u002Fprobability`](docs\u002Fprobability\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the probability toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fprobability-base-rate-anchoring`](docs\u002Fprobability\u002Fbase-rate-anchoring.md) — Anchors estimates in historical base rates before adjusting for specific factors.\n- [`\u002Fprobability-confidence-calibration`](docs\u002Fprobability\u002Fconfidence-calibration.md) — Tests whether stated confidence levels match available evidence — catching overconfidence and underconfidence.\n- [`\u002Fprobability-expected-value-calculation`](docs\u002Fprobability\u002Fexpected-value-calculation.md) — Calculates expected value to compare options under uncertainty.\n- [`\u002Fprobability-scenario-weighting`](docs\u002Fprobability\u002Fscenario-weighting.md) — Assigns explicit probabilities to distinct scenarios before making a decision.\n\n#### `\u002Fdecision`\n\n- [`\u002Fdecision`](docs\u002Fdecision\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the decision toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fdecision-criteria-weighting`](docs\u002Fdecision\u002Fcriteria-weighting.md) — Runs a weighted multi-criteria analysis — making explicit what matters, how much, and how each option performs against it.\n- [`\u002Fdecision-option-mapping`](docs\u002Fdecision\u002Foption-mapping.md) — Ensures all real options are visible before choosing — countering the false dichotomy that limits consideration to the first two options that came to mind.\n- [`\u002Fdecision-premortem-analysis`](docs\u002Fdecision\u002Fpremortem-analysis.md) — Imagines the decision has been made and failed — then diagnoses why.\n- [`\u002Fdecision-reversibility-analysis`](docs\u002Fdecision\u002Freversibility-analysis.md) — Categorises a decision by reversibility and applies the appropriate level of process rigour.\n\n#### `\u002Fconstraint`\n\n- [`\u002Fconstraint`](docs\u002Fconstraint\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the constraint toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fconstraint-hardness-testing`](docs\u002Fconstraint\u002Fhardness-testing.md) — Tests whether a stated constraint is real — distinguishing genuine limits from assumptions, habits, or politics dressed as facts.\n- [`\u002Fconstraint-rule-inversion`](docs\u002Fconstraint\u002Frule-inversion.md) — Flips a constraint into a creative driver — uses the limit as the generative force rather than working around it.\n- [`\u002Fconstraint-scope-reduction`](docs\u002Fconstraint\u002Fscope-reduction.md) — Finds the minimum that satisfies the actual requirement — stripping everything wanted but not needed.\n- [`\u002Fconstraint-workaround-mapping`](docs\u002Fconstraint\u002Fworkaround-mapping.md) — Finds paths around a fixed constraint without removing it — routing around a hard limit to reach the same goal.\n\n#### `\u002Fgame-theory`\n\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002FREADME.md) — Routes to the right game-theory skill for your strategic situation.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-auction`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fauction.md) — Analyses bidding strategy and auction design — how much to bid, how to avoid the winner's curse, and how to design revenue-maximising or efficient auctions.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-coalition`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fcoalition.md) — Analyses which coalitions form and how to divide gains fairly using cooperative game theory and the Shapley value.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-equilibrium`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fequilibrium.md) — Finds the stable outcome of a strategic interaction — the point where no player can improve their result by changing their strategy alone.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-iterated`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fiterated.md) — Analyses long-run repeated interactions — how cooperation forms, how trust is built, how defection spirals start, and which strategies sustain cooperation.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-mechanism-design`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fmechanism-design.md) — Designs rules and incentive systems that produce desired outcomes even when players are self-interested.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-prisoners-dilemma`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fprisoners-dilemma.md) — Analyses cooperation problems where individual rationality produces collective irrationality.\n- [`\u002Fgame-theory-signaling`](docs\u002Fgame-theory\u002Fsignaling.md) — Analyses credibility problems and designs signals that are believable because they're costly to fake.\n\n#### `\u002Fepistemology`\n\n- [`\u002Fepistemology`](docs\u002Fepistemology\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the epistemology toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fepistemology-epistemic-status`](docs\u002Fepistemology\u002Fepistemic-status.md) — Produces an honest, rigorous calibration of what you know vs. believe vs. assume vs. hope across a domain.\n- [`\u002Fepistemology-justification`](docs\u002Fepistemology\u002Fjustification.md) — Analyzes what would actually justify believing a claim.\n- [`\u002Fepistemology-knowledge-types`](docs\u002Fepistemology\u002Fknowledge-types.md) — Maps what kind of knowing is actually in play for a claim or question.\n- [`\u002Fepistemology-limits`](docs\u002Fepistemology\u002Flimits.md) — Identifies what can't be known and why, then clarifies what can be established within those limits and reframes the question into its answerable part.\n\n#### `\u002Finvestigation`\n\n- [`\u002Finvestigation`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the investigation toolkit.\n- [`\u002Finvestigation-claim-decomposition`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002Fclaim-decomposition.md) — Breaks a complex claim into its smallest independently verifiable parts, classifies each sub-claim, and identifies which parts carry the most logical load.\n- [`\u002Finvestigation-counter-hypothesis`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002Fcounter-hypothesis.md) — Generates the best alternative explanations for the same observations.\n- [`\u002Finvestigation-evidence-audit`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002Fevidence-audit.md) — Evaluates the quality, strength, and completeness of evidence for a claim.\n- [`\u002Finvestigation-source-trace`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002Fsource-trace.md) — Traces a claim back to its origin: who first made it, what evidence it rested on, and how it has been distorted in transmission.\n- [`\u002Finvestigation-triangulation`](docs\u002Finvestigation\u002Ftriangulation.md) — Verifies a claim across genuinely independent sources, distinguishing amplification from true corroboration.\n\n### Think Differently\n\n#### `\u002Fcreativity`\n\n- [`\u002Fcreativity`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the creativity toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-alternatives`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Falternatives.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's APC (Alternatives, Possibilities, Choices) tool to deliberately generate options before evaluating any of them.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-assumption-excavator`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fassumption-excavator.md) — Surface and challenge the hidden assumptions in any problem, plan, or framing.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-brainstorm`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fbrainstorm.md) — Run an orchestrated multi-method creative thinking sprint on a challenge.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-concept-fan`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fconcept-fan.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's Concept Fan to expand the solution space before committing to an approach.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-consider-factors`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fconsider-factors.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's CAF (Consider All Factors) tool to map every relevant factor before making a decision or taking action.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-lateral-thinking`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Flateral-thinking.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's lateral thinking to escape dominant patterns and generate genuinely new directions.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-other-perspectives`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fother-perspectives.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's OPS (Other People's Shoes) tool to genuinely think from other perspectives.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-plus-minus-interesting`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fplus-minus-interesting.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's Plus\u002FMinus\u002FInteresting (PMI) tool for balanced evaluation of any idea, proposal, plan, or decision.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-provocation`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fprovocation.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's Provocation Operation (Po) to use deliberately absurd or impossible statements as springboards to new ideas.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-random-entry`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Frandom-entry.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's Random Entry technique — use an unrelated word, object, or image as a creative springboard to break out of cognitive ruts.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-six-hats`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fsix-hats.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats for structured parallel thinking.\n- [`\u002Fcreativity-water-logic`](docs\u002Fcreativity\u002Fwater-logic.md) — Apply Edward de Bono's water logic for flow-based, non-judgmental exploration.\n\n#### `\u002Fanalogy`\n\n- [`\u002Fanalogy`](docs\u002Fanalogy\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the analogy toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fanalogy-boundary-testing`](docs\u002Fanalogy\u002Fboundary-testing.md) — Finds where an analogy breaks down before it's relied upon.\n- [`\u002Fanalogy-domain-transfer`](docs\u002Fanalogy\u002Fdomain-transfer.md) — Imports solutions from unrelated domains by finding structural similarities between your problem and solved problems elsewhere.\n- [`\u002Fanalogy-perspective-shifting`](docs\u002Fanalogy\u002Fperspective-shifting.md) — Approaches a problem from completely different fields to break the assumption blindness that comes from domain expertise.\n- [`\u002Fanalogy-structure-mapping`](docs\u002Fanalogy\u002Fstructure-mapping.md) — Identifies the deep structural correspondence between two situations — genuine isomorphism vs superficial similarity.\n\n#### `\u002Fplay`\n\n- [`\u002Fplay`](docs\u002Fplay\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the play toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fplay-constraint-inversion`](docs\u002Fplay\u002Fconstraint-inversion.md) — Removes or inverts the main constraint to see what becomes possible — then uses those unconstrained solutions to find real ones.\n- [`\u002Fplay-perspective-reversal`](docs\u002Fplay\u002Fperspective-reversal.md) — Fully inhabits the opposing perspective — competitor, critic, user, or adversary — to find what is invisible from your own position.\n- [`\u002Fplay-stimulus-generation`](docs\u002Fplay\u002Fstimulus-generation.md) — Introduces a random, unrelated element to break mental fixation — forcing new associations that bypass the groove of familiar thinking.\n- [`\u002Fplay-worst-case-reversal`](docs\u002Fplay\u002Fworst-case-reversal.md) — Deliberately designs the worst possible version — then reverses each failure mode into a design principle.\n\n### Think About People\n\n#### `\u002Fcommunication`\n\n- [`\u002Fcommunication`](docs\u002Fcommunication\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the communication toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fcommunication-audience-modeling`](docs\u002Fcommunication\u002Faudience-modeling.md) — Maps what the audience currently believes, actually cares about, and fears before communicating — because communication fails at the receiver, not the sender.\n- [`\u002Fcommunication-clarity-audit`](docs\u002Fcommunication\u002Fclarity-audit.md) — Audits a communication for places where the message will be lost, misread, or misunderstood — before it's sent.\n- [`\u002Fcommunication-medium-selection`](docs\u002Fcommunication\u002Fmedium-selection.md) — Matches the message to the right channel and format — the same content in the wrong medium loses most of its effect.\n- [`\u002Fcommunication-objection-mapping`](docs\u002Fcommunication\u002Fobjection-mapping.md) — Maps likely objections before delivering a proposal — objections that are anticipated feel addressed; objections that land as surprises derail.\n\n#### `\u002Fsocial`\n\n- [`\u002Fsocial`](docs\u002Fsocial\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the social dynamics toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fsocial-coalition-mapping`](docs\u002Fsocial\u002Fcoalition-mapping.md) — Maps who needs to be aligned, who already is, and how to build the coalition a proposal needs to succeed.\n- [`\u002Fsocial-dynamics-analysis`](docs\u002Fsocial\u002Fdynamics-analysis.md) — Identifies group psychology shaping a discussion or team — groupthink, status dynamics, coalition formation, psychological safety.\n- [`\u002Fsocial-incentive-analysis`](docs\u002Fsocial\u002Fincentive-analysis.md) — Maps the actual incentives driving behaviour — distinguishing stated motivations from the real incentive structures that shape what people do.\n- [`\u002Fsocial-power-mapping`](docs\u002Fsocial\u002Fpower-mapping.md) — Maps who holds power — formal authority, informal influence, gatekeeping, expertise — and how it flows.\n\n#### `\u002Femotional`\n\n- [`\u002Femotional`](docs\u002Femotional\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the emotional intelligence toolkit.\n- [`\u002Femotional-motivation-mapping`](docs\u002Femotional\u002Fmotivation-mapping.md) — Maps what genuinely drives different people — beyond stated reasons and job descriptions.\n- [`\u002Femotional-resistance-diagnosis`](docs\u002Femotional\u002Fresistance-diagnosis.md) — Diagnoses why people are resisting — finding what's underneath the pushback.\n- [`\u002Femotional-stakes-mapping`](docs\u002Femotional\u002Fstakes-mapping.md) — Maps what each stakeholder actually cares about underneath their stated position — because addressing the stated position while missing the real stake accomplishes nothing.\n- [`\u002Femotional-trust-audit`](docs\u002Femotional\u002Ftrust-audit.md) — Maps what is building and eroding trust in a relationship or situation — trust degrades silently until it fails loudly.\n\n#### `\u002Fethics`\n\n- [`\u002Fethics`](docs\u002Fethics\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the ethics toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fethics-bias-check`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fbias-check.md) — Evaluate an algorithm, model, ranking system, recommendation engine, or automated decision process for discriminatory patterns and unfair outcomes.\n- [`\u002Fethics-check`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fcheck.md) — A fast, comprehensive ethics report on any decision, action, or situation — runs all five ethical frameworks in a single pass.\n- [`\u002Fethics-consent-review`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fconsent-review.md) — Review a UX flow, data practice, or communication pattern to verify that user consent is genuine — informed, voluntary, and meaningful.\n- [`\u002Fethics-council`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fcouncil.md) — Run any decision, feature, policy, or action through a council of 5 ethical framework advisors who independently analyze it from different moral foundations, peer-review each other's reasoning, and synthesize a final verdict.\n- [`\u002Fethics-crisis-triage`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fcrisis-triage.md) — Rapid multi-framework ethical assessment when something has already gone wrong — a data breach, a harmful outcome, a discriminatory incident, a policy failure, or any situation requiring an urgent ethical response.\n- [`\u002Fethics-data-audit`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fdata-audit.md) — Audit a data collection, retention, or sharing decision against ethical standards.\n- [`\u002Fethics-empathy-circle`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fempathy-circle.md) — Applies Jaron Lanier's Circle of Empathy framework to determine which entities deserve moral consideration and rights.\n- [`\u002Fethics-impact-scan`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fimpact-scan.md) — Run a quick ethical impact assessment on a proposed feature, change, or decision before it ships.\n- [`\u002Fethics-vendor-review`](docs\u002Fethics\u002Fvendor-review.md) — Evaluate a third-party vendor, supplier, partner, or integration against ethical standards before signing a contract or shipping their code or service.\n\n#### `\u002Fidentity`\n\n- [`\u002Fidentity`](docs\u002Fidentity\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the identity toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fidentity-character-testing`](docs\u002Fidentity\u002Fcharacter-testing.md) — Asks what a person or organisation of genuine integrity would do — grounding decisions in character rather than calculation.\n- [`\u002Fidentity-mission-alignment`](docs\u002Fidentity\u002Fmission-alignment.md) — Tests whether a proposed decision is genuinely aligned with stated mission — or is rationalising a departure from it.\n- [`\u002Fidentity-values-clarification`](docs\u002Fidentity\u002Fvalues-clarification.md) — Surfaces and tests actual operative values — distinguishing what is stated from what decisions actually reveal.\n\n#### `\u002Fnarrative`\n\n- [`\u002Fnarrative`](docs\u002Fnarrative\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the narrative toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fnarrative-audience-modeling`](docs\u002Fnarrative\u002Faudience-modeling.md) — Maps the audience's current beliefs, real goals, fears, and threshold conditions before communicating with them.\n- [`\u002Fnarrative-frame-analysis`](docs\u002Fnarrative\u002Fframe-analysis.md) — Identifies the current frame around a situation and generates alternative frames that reveal different truths.\n- [`\u002Fnarrative-structure-mapping`](docs\u002Fnarrative\u002Fstructure-mapping.md) — Applies story architecture to any communication — proposal, presentation, strategy doc — so it moves people rather than informing them.\n- [`\u002Fnarrative-tension-mapping`](docs\u002Fnarrative\u002Ftension-mapping.md) — Finds or creates the tension that makes communication worth paying attention to.\n\n#### `\u002Fpsychology`\n\n- [`\u002Fpsychology`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the psychology toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fpsychology-behavior-change`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002Fbehavior-change.md) — Diagnose what's maintaining an entrenched behavior and design the right intervention to shift it.\n- [`\u002Fpsychology-cognitive-biases`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002Fcognitive-biases.md) — Diagnose which cognitive biases are actively distorting thinking in a specific situation.\n- [`\u002Fpsychology-heuristics`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002Fheuristics.md) — Assess the fast-thinking pattern at work — when it's reliable, when it misleads, and whether to trust or override it.\n- [`\u002Fpsychology-motivation`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002Fmotivation.md) — Diagnose what's actually driving behavior — the person's own, someone else's, or a group's.\n- [`\u002Fpsychology-persuasion`](docs\u002Fpsychology\u002Fpersuasion.md) — Identify the right influence approach and construct it for the context.\n\n#### `\u002Fmindset`\n\n- [`\u002Fmindset`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the mindset toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fmindset-flow`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002Fflow.md) — Applies Csikszentmihalyi's flow framework to diagnose why optimal experience isn't occurring and redesign the conditions for it.\n- [`\u002Fmindset-growth`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002Fgrowth.md) — Applies Carol Dweck's growth mindset research as a practical methodology — the actual mechanics, not the motivational poster version.\n- [`\u002Fmindset-positive`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002Fpositive.md) — Applies positive psychology as a rigorous practice — not pop-psychology positivity.\n- [`\u002Fmindset-reframe`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002Freframe.md) — Applies cognitive reframing as a rigorous methodology — CBT-adjacent but not therapy.\n- [`\u002Fmindset-stoic`](docs\u002Fmindset\u002Fstoic.md) — Applies the full Stoic toolkit as a practical thinking methodology.\n\n#### `\u002Fwriting`\n\n- [`\u002Fwriting`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002FREADME.md) — Routes to the right writing skill for any fiction, non-fiction, or professional writing challenge.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-arc-design`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Farc-design.md) — Maps and repairs character arcs and thematic arcs by aligning external plot events with internal change.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-argument`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fargument.md) — Builds and repairs persuasive arguments by surfacing the warrant, auditing evidence, addressing counterarguments, and identifying rhetorical substitutes.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-audience-calibration`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Faudience-calibration.md) — Calibrates writing for a specific reader by profiling their knowledge, concerns, and relationship to the topic — then rewriting for that reader without changing the substance.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-character-development`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fcharacter-development.md) — Engineers psychologically compelling characters by mapping want vs. need, wound, defence mechanism, and defining contradiction.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-copy`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fcopy.md) — Writes and audits marketing copy, landing pages, ad copy, email copy, and product descriptions using the attention-desire-action framework.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-dialogue`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fdialogue.md) — Diagnoses and repairs dialogue for subtext, voice differentiation, exposition, and forward momentum.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-executive-summary`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fexecutive-summary.md) — Produces executive summaries, 1-page briefs, and board-level documents by extracting the situation, key findings, implications, and recommendation — answer-first, one page maximum.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-inconsistency-audit`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Finconsistency-audit.md) — Runs four systematic passes to identify timeline errors, character logic violations, world-rule breaks, and physical continuity errors.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-line-editing`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fline-editing.md) — Applies five-category line-editing passes to identify and repair redundancy, nominalisations, passive voice, rhythmic monotony, and throat-clearing.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-plot-structure`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fplot-structure.md) — Diagnoses structural failures in a story using the five-beat dramatic framework — inciting incident, first turning point, midpoint, dark night, climax.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-pov`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fpov.md) — Audits point-of-view for violations, consistency, and fit.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-prose-elevation`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fprose-elevation.md) — Raises the quality of competent but flat prose by targeting abstraction, weak verbs, and sensory absence.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-report`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Freport.md) — Writes and audits business reports, briefing documents, and information reports for answer-first structure, precision, hierarchy, and navigability.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-restructure`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Frestructure.md) — Diagnoses and repairs structural problems in non-fiction, essays, and documents — wrong order, buried lead, wrong ending, proportion errors.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-rhetoric`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Frhetoric.md) — Analyses what a piece of writing is doing rhetorically — its rhetorical situation, explicit argument vs. buried frame, appeals map, and loaded language.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-scene-construction`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fscene-construction.md) — Diagnoses and repairs individual scenes using the want\u002Fobstacle\u002Foutcome framework.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-technical`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Ftechnical.md) — Writes and audits technical documentation, API docs, user guides, and specifications for completeness, sequence, precision, and audience calibration.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-tone-alignment`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Ftone-alignment.md) — Diagnoses and repairs tone drift — shifts in register, formality, warmth, or rhythm that make a piece feel like it was written by multiple people or in multiple moods.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-voice-consistency`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fvoice-consistency.md) — Extracts a voice fingerprint from strong existing passages and uses it to audit and repair voice departures.\n- [`\u002Fwriting-worldbuilding`](docs\u002Fwriting\u002Fworldbuilding.md) — Audits a fictional world for internal consistency, texture, economy, and constraint-story alignment.\n\n### Think in Time & Systems\n\n#### `\u002Fsystems`\n\n- [`\u002Fsystems`](docs\u002Fsystems\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the systems thinking toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fsystems-archetype-matching`](docs\u002Fsystems\u002Farchetype-matching.md) — Applies the 8 classic system archetypes (Senge) to diagnose recurring system behavior.\n- [`\u002Fsystems-emergence-detection`](docs\u002Fsystems\u002Femergence-detection.md) — Identifies system-level properties that exist nowhere in any individual component.\n- [`\u002Fsystems-feedback-mapping`](docs\u002Fsystems\u002Ffeedback-mapping.md) — Identifies all reinforcing (+) and balancing (−) feedback loops in a system.\n- [`\u002Fsystems-leverage-analysis`](docs\u002Fsystems\u002Fleverage-analysis.md) — Finds where small interventions produce large, lasting change using Donella Meadows' leverage point hierarchy.\n\n#### `\u002Ftemporal`\n\n- [`\u002Ftemporal`](docs\u002Ftemporal\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the temporal thinking toolkit.\n- [`\u002Ftemporal-cycle-detection`](docs\u002Ftemporal\u002Fcycle-detection.md) — Identifies what recurring cycle a situation is an instance of and where in that cycle you currently are.\n- [`\u002Ftemporal-futures-mapping`](docs\u002Ftemporal\u002Ffutures-mapping.md) — Explores possible, probable, and preferable futures using scenario thinking.\n- [`\u002Ftemporal-horizon-mapping`](docs\u002Ftemporal\u002Fhorizon-mapping.md) — Maps consequences of a decision across short, medium, and long time horizons.\n- [`\u002Ftemporal-timing-analysis`](docs\u002Ftemporal\u002Ftiming-analysis.md) — Assesses whether now is the right time to act, wait, or prepare.\n\n#### `\u002Fhistorical`\n\n- [`\u002Fhistorical`](docs\u002Fhistorical\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the historical reasoning toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fhistorical-cycle-detection`](docs\u002Fhistorical\u002Fcycle-detection.md) — Identifies what recurring cycle the current situation is an instance of — and where in that cycle you currently are.\n- [`\u002Fhistorical-failure-analysis`](docs\u002Fhistorical\u002Ffailure-analysis.md) — Extracts recurring failure modes from similar past situations — most failures have happened before in recognisable patterns.\n- [`\u002Fhistorical-lesson-extraction`](docs\u002Fhistorical\u002Flesson-extraction.md) — Extracts the transferable principle from a specific historical case — separating the contingent surface details from the underlying rule that applies across contexts.\n- [`\u002Fhistorical-precedent-analysis`](docs\u002Fhistorical\u002Fprecedent-analysis.md) — Finds and applies genuinely similar historical situations to inform a current decision — distinguishing true precedents from superficial analogies.\n\n#### `\u002Fresource`\n\n- [`\u002Fresource`](docs\u002Fresource\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the resource toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fresource-allocation-analysis`](docs\u002Fresource\u002Fallocation-analysis.md) — Distributes limited resources across competing needs — making the trade-offs explicit rather than implicit.\n- [`\u002Fresource-bottleneck-analysis`](docs\u002Fresource\u002Fbottleneck-analysis.md) — Identifies what is actually constraining throughput — using Theory of Constraints logic: the system can only move as fast as its slowest point.\n- [`\u002Fresource-leverage-mapping`](docs\u002Fresource\u002Fleverage-mapping.md) — Finds the highest-leverage use of available resources — where the same input produces the most output.\n- [`\u002Fresource-waste-audit`](docs\u002Fresource\u002Fwaste-audit.md) — Finds where resources are being lost, duplicated, or underused — the seven wastes applied to knowledge work.\n\n#### `\u002Fstrategy`\n\n- [`\u002Fstrategy`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002FREADME.md) — Routes to the right strategy skill for any adversarial or competitive reasoning situation.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-alliance`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Falliance.md) — Maps parties, identifies natural allies and swing parties, and assesses alliance stability for coalition-building in competitive contexts.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-deception`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fdeception.md) — Manages information asymmetry in legitimate competitive contexts — what to protect, what impressions work in your favor, and what your opponent may be concealing from you.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-force-economy`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fforce-economy.md) — Finds the minimum intervention that achieves the objective — especially when you're outgunned or under-resourced.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-intelligence`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fintelligence.md) — Audits what you actually know vs. what you're assuming about yourself and your opponent before acting.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-positioning`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fpositioning.md) — Builds the conditions for competitive unassailability before the contest begins.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-terrain`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fterrain.md) — Maps the competitive landscape to identify where you have advantage, where contests are evenly matched, and where engagement is costly.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-timing`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Ftiming.md) — Analyzes whether to act now or wait, reads your opponent's rhythm, and identifies trigger conditions for the right moment.\n- [`\u002Fstrategy-victory`](docs\u002Fstrategy\u002Fvictory.md) — Defines what winning actually means before the contest begins — prevents the pyrrhic trap of winning in ways that lose the larger goal.\n\n### See More Clearly\n\n#### `\u002Faesthetic`\n\n- [`\u002Faesthetic`](docs\u002Faesthetic\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the aesthetic toolkit.\n- [`\u002Faesthetic-coherence-check`](docs\u002Faesthetic\u002Fcoherence-check.md) — Tests whether the parts of something form a unified whole — finding the jarring inconsistencies that accumulate when different contributors work without a shared vision.\n- [`\u002Faesthetic-elegance-testing`](docs\u002Faesthetic\u002Felegance-testing.md) — Tests whether a solution is more complex than it needs to be — distinguishing necessary complexity from accidental complexity that accreted over time.\n- [`\u002Faesthetic-pattern-detection`](docs\u002Faesthetic\u002Fpattern-detection.md) — Identifies the underlying formal pattern at work — because most successful designs, arguments, and solutions share deep structural patterns, and naming the pattern unlocks the playbook.\n- [`\u002Faesthetic-simplicity-analysis`](docs\u002Faesthetic\u002Fsimplicity-analysis.md) — Finds the simpler version while preserving what matters — not arbitrary reduction, but finding the core and discarding what is not it.\n\n#### `\u002Fsensory`\n\n- [`\u002Fsensory`](docs\u002Fsensory\u002FREADME.md) — Entry point for the sensory observation toolkit.\n- [`\u002Fsensory-detail-mining`](docs\u002Fsensory\u002Fdetail-mining.md) — Finds specific details being overlooked — the most important information is often present but not being registered.\n- [`\u002Fsensory-signal-detection`](docs\u002Fsensory\u002Fsignal-detection.md) — Separates meaningful signal from background noise — finding what actually matters among everything present.\n- [`\u002Fsensory-structured-observation`](docs\u002Fsensory\u002Fstructured-observation.md) — Applies disciplined observation to a situation — suspending interpretation to see what's actually there before deciding what it means.\n\n---\n\n## Examples\n\n#### `\u002Flogic`\nYou believe working from home makes you more productive because you get more done on those days. `\u002Flogic-check` finds the flaw: you only work from home when you have focused work scheduled anyway — the variable you think is causing the effect is just correlated with it.\n\n#### `\u002Fprobability`\nA doctor tells you a test for a rare disease is 99% accurate and you tested positive. `\u002Fprobability-base-rate-anchoring` shows why you're probably still fine: when the disease affects 1 in 10,000 people, even a highly accurate test produces mostly false positives.\n\n#### `\u002Fdecision`\nYou've been offered a chance to move abroad for a year. It feels like a binary yes\u002Fno. `\u002Fdecision-option-mapping` surfaces four options you weren't considering: go for six months, negotiate remote work, defer by a year, or go with a return clause.\n\n#### `\u002Fconstraint`\nYou want to write a novel but insist you have no time. `\u002Fconstraint-hardness-testing` asks whether the constraint is real — and finds it's a habit dressed as a fact. The actual constraint is that you haven't protected a 45-minute slot.\n\n#### `\u002Fgame-theory`\nYou and a housemate both hate cleaning the kitchen but neither wants to go first. `\u002Fgame-theory-prisoners-dilemma` shows why this equilibrium is stable and what actually breaks it: not goodwill, but a credible commitment mechanism.\n\n#### `\u002Fepistemology`\nEveryone in your social circle agrees on a contested topic and it feels like obvious truth. `\u002Fepistemology-epistemic-status` maps how much of your belief rests on actual evidence versus social contagion — and which parts would survive if your environment were different.\n\n#### `\u002Finvestigation`\nYou've heard that people only use 10% of their brain. `\u002Finvestigation-source-trace` traces the claim back to its supposed origin and finds no credible scientific source — it appears to have emerged from a misquote and spread through repetition.\n\n#### `\u002Fcreativity`\nYou've been writing the same kind of music for three years and everything sounds the same. `\u002Fcreativity-lateral-thinking` forces you to approach the next track as if you were scoring a silent film — and the constraint breaks the pattern.\n\n#### `\u002Fanalogy`\nYou're struggling to explain how machine learning works to someone with no technical background. `\u002Fanalogy-domain-transfer` imports the structure of learning to ride a bike: you don't study the physics, you fall, adjust, and eventually your body just knows.\n\n#### `\u002Fplay`\nYour short story feels predictable but you can't see where. `\u002Fplay-worst-case-reversal` asks you to design the most boring possible version of the story — and the list of failure modes reveals exactly what the current draft is doing.\n\n#### `\u002Fcommunication`\nYou sent a message that was meant to be supportive and the other person felt criticised. `\u002Fcommunication-clarity-audit` finds the two sentences that read as judgement to the receiver even though they weren't written that way.\n\n#### `\u002Fsocial`\nA group project has stalled and nobody can explain why. `\u002Fsocial-dynamics-analysis` identifies that one person holds informal veto power over decisions and everyone else is routing around them without naming it.\n\n#### `\u002Femotional`\nA close friend keeps cancelling plans at the last minute. `\u002Femotional-resistance-diagnosis` maps what might be underneath the behaviour — not flakiness, but something they're avoiding that the plans surface.\n\n#### `\u002Fethics`\nYou found someone's wallet containing a significant amount of cash and no ID. `\u002Fethics-council` walks through five ethical frameworks and finds they mostly converge — with one genuinely dissenting position that's worth taking seriously.\n\n#### `\u002Fidentity`\nYou keep agreeing to commitments that make you miserable. `\u002Fidentity-values-clarification` surfaces the gap between what you say you value and what your decisions actually reveal — and names the value that's been running your choices without your endorsement.\n\n#### `\u002Fnarrative`\nYou're giving a speech that matters to you but it keeps landing flat in rehearsal. `\u002Fnarrative-tension-mapping` finds that you've removed all the stakes in an attempt to sound measured — and that's exactly what's killing it.\n\n#### `\u002Fpsychology`\nYou've tried to quit a habit five times and it keeps returning. `\u002Fpsychology-behavior-change` diagnoses what's maintaining it: not lack of willpower, but a specific trigger-routine-reward loop that none of your previous attempts addressed.\n\n#### `\u002Fmindset`\nYou've been dreading a difficult conversation for three weeks and it's getting worse. `\u002Fmindset-stoic` separates what's in your control from what isn't — and finds the avoidance is costing more than the conversation would.\n\n#### `\u002Fwriting`\nYour essay makes a strong argument but readers say it doesn't land. `\u002Fwriting-rhetoric` reveals the structure leads with the conclusion before earning it — the reader hasn't been brought along, so the argument feels asserted rather than demonstrated.\n\n#### `\u002Fsystems`\nEvery time your team fixes one problem, two more appear. `\u002Fsystems-feedback-mapping` finds the reinforcing loop: the fixes are creating conditions that generate the next set of problems faster than the team can resolve them.\n\n#### `\u002Ftemporal`\nYou're deciding whether to go back to study and the short-term cost feels prohibitive. `\u002Ftemporal-horizon-mapping` maps the decision at one year, five years, and twenty — and shows that the framing that makes it look impossible only holds at the shortest horizon.\n\n#### `\u002Fhistorical`\nYou're starting an ambitious creative project and feel pressure to have a breakthrough immediately. `\u002Fhistorical-failure-analysis` maps how most significant creative works actually developed: slowly, with long unproductive stretches that looked like failure until they weren't.\n\n#### `\u002Fresource`\nYou have three hours to prepare for an important conversation and you're trying to prepare for everything. `\u002Fresource-bottleneck-analysis` finds the real constraint: there are two specific questions you can't answer and everything else is already solid.\n\n#### `\u002Fstrategy`\nYou want to win a local chess tournament. `\u002Fstrategy-positioning` shows that the decisive work happens before the match: in the openings you prepare, the players you study, and the psychological state you arrive in.\n\n#### `\u002Faesthetic`\nYour apartment feels wrong but you can't articulate why. `\u002Faesthetic-coherence-check` finds that three incompatible design eras are competing in the same room — and the feeling of wrongness is the parts refusing to form a whole.\n\n#### `\u002Fsensory`\nYou've read the same paragraph four times and nothing is sticking. `\u002Fsensory-signal-detection` asks what's actually present in your environment right now that you've stopped registering — and finds three things competing for the same attention channel.\n","skills-for-humanity 项目将历史上最严谨思想家的结构化推理方法封装为 Claude Code 技能。该项目包含171种技能，涵盖逻辑、概率、决策制定、创造性思维、系统思考等27个类别，每项技能都提供了一个完整的程序来解决特定类型的问题。使用 JavaScript 编写，并以 npm 包的形式发布，易于安装和更新。适用于需要提高批判性思维、创新能力和问题解决能力的各种场景，如教育、个人发展、团队协作及决策支持等领域。通过简单的命令行接口即可调用相应技能，帮助用户无需深入了解具体理论就能有效应用这些经典思维方式。","2026-06-11 03:59:39","CREATED_QUERY"]